<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Print Quarterly &#8211; the metabunker</title>
	<atom:link href="https://metabunker.dk/tag/print-quarterly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://metabunker.dk</link>
	<description>by matthias wivel &#38; friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 14:45:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>How Comics Are Made reviewed</title>
		<link>https://metabunker.dk/2026/07/07/how-comics-are-made-reviewed/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthias Wivel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 14:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[comics and cartooning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commentary and criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hype & linkage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pictorial arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comics history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Fleishman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print Quarterly]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metabunker.dk/?p=10301</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In the latest issue of Print Quarterly, I review Glenn Fleishman&#8217;s instructive, detail-oriented How Comics Are Made &#8212; A Visual History from the Drawing Board to the Printed Page. The book is a very helpful examination of the complicated, sometimes arcane, production and printing processes behind newspaper strips in particular, from the late nineteenth century&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" src="https://howcomicsweremade.ink/images/cover-images/HCWM-cover.sm.jpg" alt="How Comics Were Made: A Visual History from the Drawing Board to the  Printed Page" /></p>
<p>In the <a href="https://printquarterly.co.uk/contents-of-volume-43-2026/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">latest issue of <em>Print Quarterly</em></a>, I review Glenn Fleishman&#8217;s instructive, detail-oriented <em>How Comics Are Made &#8212; A Visual History from the Drawing Board to the Printed Page</em>. The book is a very helpful examination of the complicated, sometimes arcane, production and printing processes behind newspaper strips in particular, from the late nineteenth century till today. Here&#8217;s an excerpt:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<blockquote><p>Chromolithography, Electrotype, chalk plates, flongs, Zip-a-Tone, X-Acto knives, Ben Day dots, stat cameras, Rubylith, rubber cement, Wacom. The terms emanating from mass media printing in the modern era, notably in the realm of comic strips, are recondite yet evocative. They might baffle even print connoisseurs, and while comics afficionados are generally vaguely familiar with them, the arcane, highly specialized processes of which they are part, and which have brought comics to life on the page for upward of two centuries, remain exotic abstracts to most.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>In steps Fleishman with this comprehensive study of the printing techniques of North American newspaper comics from the dawn of mass media to the digital present. Not an academic study, the book brings the enthusiastic zeal and keen attention to detail which, in the still institutionally unconsolidated domain of comics and cartoon studies, largely remains the preserve of fans.</p></blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>In other words, this book is a balm for anyone curious about this and as such highly recommended.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Catch the <a href="https://printquarterly.co.uk/contents-of-volume-43-2026/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">review in <em>Print Quaterly</em></a>, available in better research libraries the world over!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aretino in Print Quarterly</title>
		<link>https://metabunker.dk/2022/05/16/aretino-in-print-quarterly/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthias Wivel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2022 22:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[commentary and criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hype & linkage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pictorial arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pietro Aretino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print Quarterly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Titian]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metabunker.dk/?p=8799</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In the latest issue of Print Quarterly, vol. 39, no. 1, I review three publications &#8212; an exhibition catalogue from the Uffizi and two scholarly anthologies &#8212; around the Venetian writer, polemicist and literary activist Pietro Aretino (1492-1556), with a specific view to their treatment of Aretino&#8217;s relationship with prints and printmaking. Aretino was involved&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://metabunker.dk/?attachment_id=8800" rel="attachment wp-att-8800"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" src="http://metabunker.dk/wp-content/uploads/RCT_Aretino_profile_crop-500x616.jpg" alt="" title="RCT_Aretino_profile_crop" width="500" height="616" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-8800" srcset="https://metabunker.dk/wp-content/uploads/RCT_Aretino_profile_crop-500x616.jpg 500w, https://metabunker.dk/wp-content/uploads/RCT_Aretino_profile_crop-830x1024.jpg 830w, https://metabunker.dk/wp-content/uploads/RCT_Aretino_profile_crop.jpeg 1338w" sizes="(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /></a><br />
In the latest issue of <a target="new" href="https://printquarterly.co.uk/contents-of-volume-39-2022/"><em>Print Quarterly</em>, vol. 39, no. 1</a>, I review three publications &#8212; an exhibition catalogue from the Uffizi and two scholarly anthologies &#8212; around the Venetian writer, polemicist and literary activist Pietro Aretino (1492-1556), with a specific view to their treatment of Aretino&#8217;s relationship with prints and printmaking. </p>
<p>Aretino was involved in printmaking throughout his career, employing it as a way of self-promotion but also encouraging creative engagement in the medium on the part of his friends, not least Titian. In the review, I reattribute the design of an engraved portrait of Aretino of around 1534 by Jacopo Caraglio, and a woodcut frontispiece based on the same model, to Titian. Consult the issue at your local art library!</p>
<p>Publications reviewed: Anne Bisceglia, Matteo Ceriana and Paolo Procaccioli, eds., <em>Pietro Aretino a l&#8217;arte nel Rinascimento</em>, exh. cat. Florence, Uffizi, Florence 2019; Anne Bisceglia, Matteo Ceriana and Paolo Procaccioli, eds., <em>&#8220;Pietro Pictore Aretino&#8221;: Una parola complice per l&#8217;arte del Rinascimento</em>, Venice 2019; and Anne Bisceglia, Matteo Ceriana and Paolo Procaccioli, eds., <em>Inchiostro per colore: arte e artisti in Pietro Aretino</em>, Rome 2019.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arcadia in Print Quarterly</title>
		<link>https://metabunker.dk/2014/11/19/arcadia-in-print-quarterly/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthias Wivel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2014 22:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[commentary and criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hype & linkage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pictorial arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domenico Campagnola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Giulio Campagnola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print Quarterly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Staaliche Museen Berlin]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metabunker.dk/?p=6405</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In the latest issue of Print Quarterly (vol. XXXI, no. 4), I&#8217;ve reviewed the catalogue of the exhibition &#8220;Arcadia &#8212; Paradies auf Papier, Landschaft und Mythos in Italien&#8221;, displayed at the Kupferstichkabinett of the Staatliche Museen in Berlin earlier this year. The exhibition was based entirely on the Kupferstichkabinett&#8217;s incredibly rich holdings and provides a&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_6406" style="width: 510px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-6406" src="http://metabunker.dk/wp-content/uploads/Berlin_Arcadian_Musicians-500x268.jpg" alt="" title="Berlin_Arcadian_Musicians" width="500" height="268" class="size-medium wp-image-6406" srcset="https://metabunker.dk/wp-content/uploads/Berlin_Arcadian_Musicians-500x268.jpg 500w, https://metabunker.dk/wp-content/uploads/Berlin_Arcadian_Musicians-1024x549.jpg 1024w" sizes="(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /><p id="caption-attachment-6406" class="wp-caption-text">Giulio and Domenico Campagnola, Musicians in a Landscape, c. 1517, engraving, Berlin, Kupferstichkabinett</p></div><br />
In the latest issue of <a target="new" href="http://www.printquarterly.com/"><em>Print Quarterly</em></a> (vol. XXXI, no. 4), I&#8217;ve reviewed the catalogue of the exhibition &#8220;Arcadia &#8212; Paradies auf Papier, Landschaft und Mythos in Italien&#8221;, displayed at the Kupferstichkabinett of the Staatliche Museen in Berlin earlier this year. </p>
<p>The exhibition was based entirely on the Kupferstichkabinett&#8217;s incredibly rich holdings and provides a stimulating overview of Arcadian imagery in Italian graphic art from c. 1440-1640.The catalogue is written by Dagmar Korbacher, Christophe Brouard and Marco RiccÃ²mini. It contains innovative takes on especially the Venetian drawings and engravings of Giulio and Domenico Campagnola and related artists, like the above masterpiece by the two of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Object Caching 18/40 objects using Disk
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: metabunker.dk @ 2026-08-05 08:07:51 by W3 Total Cache
-->