<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Author&#8217;s Face?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://metabunker.dk/2011/11/02/3627/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://metabunker.dk/2011/11/02/3627/</link>
	<description>by matthias wivel &#38; friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 20:59:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Matthias Wivel		</title>
		<link>https://metabunker.dk/2011/11/02/3627/comment-page-1/#comment-33699</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthias Wivel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 20:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metabunker.dk/?p=3627#comment-33699</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ah, I&#039;m happy you pegged it as a self-portrait too. I was worried I was the only one seeing things where nothing might be :)

I feel your distaste for mocap animation in general, but didn&#039;t find it all that terrible here. The difference between this and, say, Robert Zemeckis&#039; awful work with the technique is that they manage to breathe life into his characters and generally bring an eye for detail to the proceedings

In a way, I understand why they chose not to imitate Hergé&#039;s clear line. It would have been an exercise in futility to try to capture the visual magic of the comics on film, I think (all previous attempts have been uniformly dreadful for what that&#039;s worth).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, I&#8217;m happy you pegged it as a self-portrait too. I was worried I was the only one seeing things where nothing might be 🙂</p>
<p>I feel your distaste for mocap animation in general, but didn&#8217;t find it all that terrible here. The difference between this and, say, Robert Zemeckis&#8217; awful work with the technique is that they manage to breathe life into his characters and generally bring an eye for detail to the proceedings</p>
<p>In a way, I understand why they chose not to imitate Hergé&#8217;s clear line. It would have been an exercise in futility to try to capture the visual magic of the comics on film, I think (all previous attempts have been uniformly dreadful for what that&#8217;s worth).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Katherine Collins		</title>
		<link>https://metabunker.dk/2011/11/02/3627/comment-page-1/#comment-33687</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Katherine Collins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 22:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metabunker.dk/?p=3627#comment-33687</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I pegged the villain as a Spielberg caricature in the first second I saw him in the trailer. It is unmistakable. If it&#039;s for the purpose of counterbalancing Hergé&#039;s anti-Semitism, then good for Spielberg. But as a narrative device, it creates a huge stumbling block, at least for me. It is too noticeable and self-conscious, in a movie that already distances the viewer from engagement, due to the execrable and pointless motion-capture system of &quot;animation&quot;. Speaking of which, I absolutely fail to understand why Spielberg, or anybody else, thinks this technology is a good idea. It seems to work when a character is inserted into a live action film, but as the entire film, forget it. With Hergé&#039;s beautiful &quot;clear line&quot; available as inspiration, why in the world, for all the money spent, didn&#039;t purported animation fan Spielberg do 2-D animation? It could have been a thing of beauty.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I pegged the villain as a Spielberg caricature in the first second I saw him in the trailer. It is unmistakable. If it&#8217;s for the purpose of counterbalancing Hergé&#8217;s anti-Semitism, then good for Spielberg. But as a narrative device, it creates a huge stumbling block, at least for me. It is too noticeable and self-conscious, in a movie that already distances the viewer from engagement, due to the execrable and pointless motion-capture system of &#8220;animation&#8221;. Speaking of which, I absolutely fail to understand why Spielberg, or anybody else, thinks this technology is a good idea. It seems to work when a character is inserted into a live action film, but as the entire film, forget it. With Hergé&#8217;s beautiful &#8220;clear line&#8221; available as inspiration, why in the world, for all the money spent, didn&#8217;t purported animation fan Spielberg do 2-D animation? It could have been a thing of beauty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Object Caching 21/40 objects using Disk
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: metabunker.dk @ 2026-08-24 22:18:11 by W3 Total Cache
-->