<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: In the Mix (MoCCA 2011)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://metabunker.dk/2011/04/16/in-the-mix-mocca-2011/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://metabunker.dk/2011/04/16/in-the-mix-mocca-2011/</link>
	<description>by matthias wivel &#38; friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 02:19:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Matthias Wivel		</title>
		<link>https://metabunker.dk/2011/04/16/in-the-mix-mocca-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-31310</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthias Wivel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 02:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metabunker.dk/?p=2955#comment-31310</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Man, you look like a million $ in that picture, especially with the bovine background. And yeah, it was a real good time. Looking forward to seeing the US version of the Concubine too.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, you look like a million $ in that picture, especially with the bovine background. And yeah, it was a real good time. Looking forward to seeing the US version of the Concubine too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Palle Schmidt		</title>
		<link>https://metabunker.dk/2011/04/16/in-the-mix-mocca-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-31279</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Palle Schmidt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 07:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metabunker.dk/?p=2955#comment-31279</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I thought you were taking a picture of the store window, it was full of cows! And sheep! You caught me looking like a smartass... Nice hanging out with you, though. 

As for the stagnation or not, I really wouldn&#039;t know. I felt the odd man out at MoCCA, my tastes way too mainstream for most of the stuff on display. I brought home a lot of good stuff, though. The whole trip was really inspirational, great meeting other artist. And it seems my work has finally found it&#039;s real audience, Can&#039;t wait &#039;till my book hits the stores..!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought you were taking a picture of the store window, it was full of cows! And sheep! You caught me looking like a smartass&#8230; Nice hanging out with you, though. </p>
<p>As for the stagnation or not, I really wouldn&#8217;t know. I felt the odd man out at MoCCA, my tastes way too mainstream for most of the stuff on display. I brought home a lot of good stuff, though. The whole trip was really inspirational, great meeting other artist. And it seems my work has finally found it&#8217;s real audience, Can&#8217;t wait &#8217;till my book hits the stores..!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Matthias Wivel		</title>
		<link>https://metabunker.dk/2011/04/16/in-the-mix-mocca-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-31171</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthias Wivel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 15:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metabunker.dk/?p=2955#comment-31171</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Darryl,
Thank you for commenting! Your points are well taken, but I think you&#039;re working under a misimpression: this is not a piece of journalism, merely some overall, very subjective thoughts. It should be obvious that I haven&#039;t run a survey of all the work debuting at the festival, grading each according to some set of acceptable aesthetic criteria.

However: I did walk all the aisles, several times, and I did look closely at books at many of the tables. I talked to people. Plus I have a certain amount of experience in the field, and have been to many festivals. This is the impression I came away with. 

But as I say, I may have missed some great work somewhere. I couldn&#039;t buy or read more than a fraction of what was on offer, so I apologize in advance to anyone whose work I may have slighted inadvertently.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Darryl,<br />
Thank you for commenting! Your points are well taken, but I think you&#8217;re working under a misimpression: this is not a piece of journalism, merely some overall, very subjective thoughts. It should be obvious that I haven&#8217;t run a survey of all the work debuting at the festival, grading each according to some set of acceptable aesthetic criteria.</p>
<p>However: I did walk all the aisles, several times, and I did look closely at books at many of the tables. I talked to people. Plus I have a certain amount of experience in the field, and have been to many festivals. This is the impression I came away with. </p>
<p>But as I say, I may have missed some great work somewhere. I couldn&#8217;t buy or read more than a fraction of what was on offer, so I apologize in advance to anyone whose work I may have slighted inadvertently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: darrylayo		</title>
		<link>https://metabunker.dk/2011/04/16/in-the-mix-mocca-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-31170</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[darrylayo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 13:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metabunker.dk/?p=2955#comment-31170</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Excuse me, brother.

I find it highly offensive that you can make sweeping pronouncements about whether there was fresh or exciting work at a show when you also admit that you didn&#039;t see everything.

A comic journalist should have different concerns from a casual show attendee. Did you look at each table? Not just glance as you walked down the middle of the show aisles; did you actually go table to table and consider each attendee, regardless of initial impression? Because realistically, it&#039;s not hard to do. Yes, it&#039;s time consuming and yes, it would take the whole weekend and yes, you will have a lot of awkward conversations with socially inept cartoonists. But that is the job.

I hate to come down on you alone because a whole lot of other comic journalists have been doing this for years. But basically, if you don&#039;t walk table to table and handle all of the comics, it&#039;s wrong to dismiss the exhibitors as a whole.

In your article, you talk about mostly established cartoonists, some with decades-long careers. At one point, you reference the comics culture&#039;s interest in someone&#039;s project. Come on! YOU ARE THE COMIC CULTURE! Ironically, I have a hard time at shows seeing established cartoonists because I am so busy checking out new work. See the work for yourself, discover new work in addition to old favorites. Discover things you&#039;re not immediately familiar with before you call yourself writing a convention report. Otherwise, you&#039;re just a casual attendee, not a serious journalist. Ask the questions. Do the work. Talk to the people.

Again, I&#039;m sorry to come down on you alone, because you&#039;re far from the only culprit. I&#039;m saying that comics deserves better.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excuse me, brother.</p>
<p>I find it highly offensive that you can make sweeping pronouncements about whether there was fresh or exciting work at a show when you also admit that you didn&#8217;t see everything.</p>
<p>A comic journalist should have different concerns from a casual show attendee. Did you look at each table? Not just glance as you walked down the middle of the show aisles; did you actually go table to table and consider each attendee, regardless of initial impression? Because realistically, it&#8217;s not hard to do. Yes, it&#8217;s time consuming and yes, it would take the whole weekend and yes, you will have a lot of awkward conversations with socially inept cartoonists. But that is the job.</p>
<p>I hate to come down on you alone because a whole lot of other comic journalists have been doing this for years. But basically, if you don&#8217;t walk table to table and handle all of the comics, it&#8217;s wrong to dismiss the exhibitors as a whole.</p>
<p>In your article, you talk about mostly established cartoonists, some with decades-long careers. At one point, you reference the comics culture&#8217;s interest in someone&#8217;s project. Come on! YOU ARE THE COMIC CULTURE! Ironically, I have a hard time at shows seeing established cartoonists because I am so busy checking out new work. See the work for yourself, discover new work in addition to old favorites. Discover things you&#8217;re not immediately familiar with before you call yourself writing a convention report. Otherwise, you&#8217;re just a casual attendee, not a serious journalist. Ask the questions. Do the work. Talk to the people.</p>
<p>Again, I&#8217;m sorry to come down on you alone, because you&#8217;re far from the only culprit. I&#8217;m saying that comics deserves better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Object Caching 21/27 objects using Disk
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: metabunker.dk @ 2026-08-24 21:19:30 by W3 Total Cache
-->