<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Comics of the Decade: Frank Miller&#8217;s The Dark Knight Strikes Again	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://metabunker.dk/2010/11/15/comics-of-the-decade-frank-millers-the-dark-knight-strikes-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://metabunker.dk/2010/11/15/comics-of-the-decade-frank-millers-the-dark-knight-strikes-again/</link>
	<description>by matthias wivel &#38; friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 22:10:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Matthias Wivel		</title>
		<link>https://metabunker.dk/2010/11/15/comics-of-the-decade-frank-millers-the-dark-knight-strikes-again/comment-page-1/#comment-17571</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthias Wivel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 23:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metabunker.dk/?p=2595#comment-17571</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hey Tony -- thanks for your comment! Thomas is away on holiday, but may get back to this next week and answer for his words! What I can say is that it was written on a reader&#039;s high when the comic was still fresh in the world.

My esteem has only grown for DK2 since it came out. It&#039;s really original balls-out cartooning that manages to grasp many of the things that are great about superheroes, without even seeming to try that hard. Lot&#039;s of fun and really quite weirdly creative -- sad that Miller hasn&#039;t really managed anything like it since, despite trying to replicate the formula.

Another thing that struck me is that Miller, once again, defined a new subgenre here -- the irreverent, counter-intuitive, &#039;art&#039;-superhero comic. There&#039;s been lots of those since, and currently that Neal Adams trainwreck is garnering the kind of accolades DK2 only saw a few of when it came out.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Tony &#8212; thanks for your comment! Thomas is away on holiday, but may get back to this next week and answer for his words! What I can say is that it was written on a reader&#8217;s high when the comic was still fresh in the world.</p>
<p>My esteem has only grown for DK2 since it came out. It&#8217;s really original balls-out cartooning that manages to grasp many of the things that are great about superheroes, without even seeming to try that hard. Lot&#8217;s of fun and really quite weirdly creative &#8212; sad that Miller hasn&#8217;t really managed anything like it since, despite trying to replicate the formula.</p>
<p>Another thing that struck me is that Miller, once again, defined a new subgenre here &#8212; the irreverent, counter-intuitive, &#8216;art&#8217;-superhero comic. There&#8217;s been lots of those since, and currently that Neal Adams trainwreck is garnering the kind of accolades DK2 only saw a few of when it came out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tony W.		</title>
		<link>https://metabunker.dk/2010/11/15/comics-of-the-decade-frank-millers-the-dark-knight-strikes-again/comment-page-1/#comment-17545</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony W.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metabunker.dk/?p=2595#comment-17545</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Entertaing article, and I enjoyed reading it.  It does seem that the fans of DK2 (and I&#039;m not quite sure where I fall; half of me thinks it&#039;s crap and the other half thinks it&#039;s a fun Silver-Age-by-way-of-the-Modern-Age romp), Frank Miller channeling his own twisted versions of Kurt Busiek and/or Mark Waid sensibilities.  While you articulate that schism rather nicely, I would have preferred a bit more detail in your conclusion/wrap-up here about why you praise it so highly.   

From what I remember, there&#039;s no doubt that the book has clever concepts and a fond nostalgia for the characters (especially Miller&#039;s use of the Ray Palmer Atom and Barry Allen - seen here long before their Geoff Johns-inspired returns to the spotlight).  And it just may be that the wackiness of the whole thing works, in a bizarre way.  Or at least is entertaining in a stream-of-consciousness way, as you point out.  &quot;Great art,&quot; though?   &quot;Masterpiece&quot;?  Hmmm...    I can&#039;t quite agree there, although it is fun.

I&#039;m long overdue for a re-read of DK2.  Thanks for the article and thanks for the reminder to check it out once more.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Entertaing article, and I enjoyed reading it.  It does seem that the fans of DK2 (and I&#8217;m not quite sure where I fall; half of me thinks it&#8217;s crap and the other half thinks it&#8217;s a fun Silver-Age-by-way-of-the-Modern-Age romp), Frank Miller channeling his own twisted versions of Kurt Busiek and/or Mark Waid sensibilities.  While you articulate that schism rather nicely, I would have preferred a bit more detail in your conclusion/wrap-up here about why you praise it so highly.   </p>
<p>From what I remember, there&#8217;s no doubt that the book has clever concepts and a fond nostalgia for the characters (especially Miller&#8217;s use of the Ray Palmer Atom and Barry Allen &#8211; seen here long before their Geoff Johns-inspired returns to the spotlight).  And it just may be that the wackiness of the whole thing works, in a bizarre way.  Or at least is entertaining in a stream-of-consciousness way, as you point out.  &#8220;Great art,&#8221; though?   &#8220;Masterpiece&#8221;?  Hmmm&#8230;    I can&#8217;t quite agree there, although it is fun.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m long overdue for a re-read of DK2.  Thanks for the article and thanks for the reminder to check it out once more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: gb		</title>
		<link>https://metabunker.dk/2010/11/15/comics-of-the-decade-frank-millers-the-dark-knight-strikes-again/comment-page-1/#comment-17530</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metabunker.dk/?p=2595#comment-17530</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sweetness indeedy! Skud ud til Rackham!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweetness indeedy! Skud ud til Rackham!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Object Caching 21/38 objects using Disk
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: metabunker.dk @ 2026-09-11 22:08:59 by W3 Total Cache
-->