<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Not the Thing Itself	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://metabunker.dk/2009/09/09/second-chance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://metabunker.dk/2009/09/09/second-chance/</link>
	<description>by matthias wivel &#38; friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 13:28:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Matthias Wivel		</title>
		<link>https://metabunker.dk/2009/09/09/second-chance/comment-page-1/#comment-2024</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthias Wivel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 14:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metabunker.dk/?p=2117#comment-2024</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve certainly been less impressed with his novels than with his 80s and 90s comics work, which I still consider very good, but the vast majority of the greatly expanded audience he has reached by switching to pure prose would probably disagree. On the other hand, I find his books enjoyable enough to keep reading them, so I don&#039;t find them all bad.

To me, the only novel of his that works well is Neverwhere and that, incidentally, was first written with visual representation -- a tv series -- in mind. Good Omens I guess was fun, but really seemed more a Terry Pratchett novel, Stardust is kind of boring, and Anansi Boys wrings a disappointingly shallow story from a great basic metaphor of identity.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve certainly been less impressed with his novels than with his 80s and 90s comics work, which I still consider very good, but the vast majority of the greatly expanded audience he has reached by switching to pure prose would probably disagree. On the other hand, I find his books enjoyable enough to keep reading them, so I don&#8217;t find them all bad.</p>
<p>To me, the only novel of his that works well is Neverwhere and that, incidentally, was first written with visual representation &#8212; a tv series &#8212; in mind. Good Omens I guess was fun, but really seemed more a Terry Pratchett novel, Stardust is kind of boring, and Anansi Boys wrings a disappointingly shallow story from a great basic metaphor of identity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ng Suat Tong		</title>
		<link>https://metabunker.dk/2009/09/09/second-chance/comment-page-1/#comment-2022</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ng Suat Tong]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 11:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metabunker.dk/?p=2117#comment-2022</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Matthias. It is interesting that you suggest that Gaiman&#039;s comics are his best works across all mediums (I presume this includes things like Mr. Punch, Signal to Noise and Violent Cases). If this is the case, it would seem like a bit of a downward spiral for Gaiman over the last few years.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Matthias. It is interesting that you suggest that Gaiman&#8217;s comics are his best works across all mediums (I presume this includes things like Mr. Punch, Signal to Noise and Violent Cases). If this is the case, it would seem like a bit of a downward spiral for Gaiman over the last few years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Matthias Wivel		</title>
		<link>https://metabunker.dk/2009/09/09/second-chance/comment-page-1/#comment-2021</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthias Wivel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metabunker.dk/?p=2117#comment-2021</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Coraline is simpler and more elegant and works with a time tested premise (through the looking glass as metaphor for maturation), which it updates to a contemporary setting. I don&#039;t think it suffers in quality because it&#039;s aimed for children -- to the contrary -- but it may have meant less exposure.

American Gods is in some ways more ambitious, but it also seems to me directionless, as if Gaiman was working on the strength of a clever idea, but never quite figured out where to take it, resulting in a rather weak last third.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coraline is simpler and more elegant and works with a time tested premise (through the looking glass as metaphor for maturation), which it updates to a contemporary setting. I don&#8217;t think it suffers in quality because it&#8217;s aimed for children &#8212; to the contrary &#8212; but it may have meant less exposure.</p>
<p>American Gods is in some ways more ambitious, but it also seems to me directionless, as if Gaiman was working on the strength of a clever idea, but never quite figured out where to take it, resulting in a rather weak last third.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ng Suat Tong		</title>
		<link>https://metabunker.dk/2009/09/09/second-chance/comment-page-1/#comment-2019</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ng Suat Tong]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 02:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metabunker.dk/?p=2117#comment-2019</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Is &quot;Coraline&quot; better than &quot;American Gods&quot;? I have no intention of reading &quot;Coraline&quot; but I assumed that the latter book was the more famous if only because of its Hugo award.  Perhaps &quot;Coraline&quot; suffers because it is aimed at children?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is &#8220;Coraline&#8221; better than &#8220;American Gods&#8221;? I have no intention of reading &#8220;Coraline&#8221; but I assumed that the latter book was the more famous if only because of its Hugo award.  Perhaps &#8220;Coraline&#8221; suffers because it is aimed at children?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Object Caching 18/40 objects using Disk
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: metabunker.dk @ 2026-08-06 19:13:32 by W3 Total Cache
-->